Daniel Michalski vs Zdenek Kolar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
W W L W W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Michalski 1 - 2 Kolar
They have played 7 sets in total, with Michalski winning 3 and Kolar winning 4. The last match between Michalski and Kolar was at the Zadar Challenger, 17-03-2025, Q3, Clay with Zdenek Kolar getting the victory 6-3 6-7(1) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Michalski | 1 |
| Zdenek Kolar | 2 |
Zadar Challenger(17-03-2025)
6
3
6
7
6
3
| Michalski | Stats | Kolar |
|---|---|---|
| 71% (22-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (21-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 315 | Ranking | 430 |
| 243 | Highest Rank | 111 |
| 25 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 10 |
| 63% (261-152) | Career Total W/L | 56% (402-318) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $388,240 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rinderknech VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kartal VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 |
Stats 
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Zdenek Kolar
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Daniel Michalski
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
81)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 36 | Games Won | 38 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:22:45 | Average Match Time | 2:22:45 |
| 60% (154/255) | 1st Serve % | 63% (146/230) |
| 63% (97/154) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (89/146) |
| 47% (47/101) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (41/84) |
| 52% (11/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (14/35) |
| 43% (100/230) | Return Points Win % | 44% (111/255) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Moise Kouame
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Alexey Vatutin
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
84%
(
88 of
105)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
113
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(6) 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
47%
(
20 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
83%
(
19 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Jakub Nicod
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
37
Total Points Won
35
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Stijn Slump
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Eero Vasa
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
91 of
134)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
55 of
91)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
60 of
134)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Zdenek Kolar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Zdenek Kolar
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Zdenek Kolar
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Artur Kukasian
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Zdenek Kolar
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Sebastian Sorger
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
76%
(
56 of
74)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Nikita Mashtakov
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Zdenek Kolar
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (261/152) | Win/Loss | 56% (402/318) |
| 61% (575/372) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (902/758) |
| 54% (4668/3937) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8088/7575) |
| 48% (30/32) | Hard Win/Loss | 39% (25/39) |
| 66% (226/114) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (281/195) |
| 45% (5/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (91/77) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 575 | Aces Total | 1977 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 833 | Total Double Faults | 1705 |
| 1:49:27 | Average Match Time | 1:29:22 |
| 500.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.96 |
| 62% (16739/27165) | 1st Serve % | 62% (28113/45560) |
| 64% (10792/16739) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (18824/28113) |
| 51% (5356/10426) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8675/17457) |
| 48% (1581/3324) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2060/4599) |
| 44% (12233/27516) | Return Points Win % | 41% (18479/45199) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 42% (18/25) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Main Tour W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 50% (68/69) | Challenger W/L | 51% (217/208) |
| 71% (192/78) | Futures W/L | 68% (159/74) |
| 63% (257/406) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (396/710) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 66% (56/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (99/203) |
| 55% (71/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (119/219) |
| 87% (257/223) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (398/349) |
| 13% (257/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (398/49) |
| 24% (156/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (322/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
